| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 454 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
INCY Cybertech (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Equity shareholders consenting to approval of scheme-The petitioner-companies, i.e. the transferor and transferee-companies, had sought sanction to their scheme of amalgamation. Meetings of equity shareh [LexDoc Id : 383693]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
O.L. of Neeka Tubes Ltd. vs Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 379536]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Aarti Industries Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Scheme approved by all equity shareholders and creditors-The transferee company had sought sanction to its scheme of amalgamation with the transferor companies. The scheme was approved by all the equity shar [LexDoc Id : 396523]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs RBI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386433]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Idea Cellular Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 381938]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Idea Cellular Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 379535]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Nukala Nageswara Rao vs Bharat Circuits (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 400840]
|
CLB |
2009 |
21st Century Management Services Ltd. vs Gujarat Industrial Investment Corpn. Ltd.
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Admitted amount not deposited before court to show bona fides-In a petition for winding up of the appellant on account of its inability to pay debts, the appellant contended that only certain sum was due and paya [LexDoc Id : 405276]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Probir Kumar Misra vs Ramani Ramaswamy and Ors.
Promoters of company: Liability of promoters-Civil liability for misstatements in prospectus-A reading of s.62(1) made it clear that for any misstatement in the prospectus every person who was a promoter of the company could be made liable for [LexDoc Id : 395341]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
HCL Infosystems Ltd. vs Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 388890]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Mukesh P. Patel vs Vijay Mukesh Chits (P) Ltd.
Offence by company: Liability of directors-Dishonour of cheque-The respondent had filed a private complaint for an offence punishable under s.138 and s.142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 against the accuse [LexDoc Id : 387030]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
P.L. Narasimhalu vs Assistant ROC
Offence by company: Non-filing of annual returns and balance sheet-Offence relating to years subsequent to resignation-The high court noted that the petitioner had resigned his post of director of the company in April 1994. The same was accepted by the company in May 1 [LexDoc Id : 378505]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd.
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Debts due undisputed, Company unable to have control over its assets-The petitioner-bank had granted to the respondent-company a working capital demand loan with a special limit of cash credit plus a revolving short ter [LexDoc Id : 378258]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
ICAI Accounting Research Foundation and Anr. vs Director General of Income Tax (Ememptions) and Ors.
Charitable Purpose-Imparting education in accountancy-The petitioner was a foundation created by ICAI for imparting education in the field of accountancy. It was a charitable purpose. It’s services were a [LexDoc Id : 371090]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Nova Polyyarn Ltd. vs Nil
Nova Polyyarn Ltd., In re
Scheme approved by requisite majority of shareholders and creditors-Objection relating to filing of latest financial statement-The petitioner-company had sought for sanction to a scheme of arrangement whereby a company was to be demerged with it. The scheme had been approved b [LexDoc Id : 379691]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
S. Chandresen vs Transworld Garnet India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 386107]
|
CLB |
2009 |
H.B. Stockholdings Ltd. vs D.C.M. Shriram Industries Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383294]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
P. Narayanasamy and Ors. vs Neela Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380206]
|
CLB |
2009 |
S. Chandresan vs Transworld Garnet India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 378499]
|
CLB |
2009 |
HB Stockholdings Ltd. vs DCM Shriram Industries Ltd and Ors.
Powers of CLB-Jurisdiction of civil court impliedly barred-The power of Company Law Board under s.402 (g) of the Companies Act 1956 would include the passing of an order, which might provide for any other matt [LexDoc Id : 370142]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
P. Narayanasamy and Ors. vs Tiruppur Transports (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 386430]
|
CLB |
2009 |
T.V. Raju Naidu and Anr. vs Tiruppur Karur Transports (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383520]
|
CLB |
2009 |
P. Narayanasamy and Ors. vs Tiruppur Transports (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 378263]
|
CLB |
2009 |
IFCI Venture Capital Funds Ltd. vs Bhiwani Denim and Apparel Ltd. and Ors.
Sale of property of company in liquidation: Participation in bidding by one company not resulting in confirmation of sale in favour of another company-Highest bidder and its sister concern independent entities and incorporated as companies, Dismissal of application for confirmation of sale in favour of sister concern upheld-It was neither conceivable in law nor in tune with the policy of law to confirm a sale in favour of a company other than the one, which participated i [LexDoc Id : 395193]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Hillcrest Reality vs Ram Parshotam Mittal and Ors.
Utilisation of premium account for upgrading the business-Requirement of approval under s.100 and s.101-The procedure envisioned under the Companies Act 1956 apparently had safeguards i.e. a special resolution and approval for the proposed reduction of c [LexDoc Id : 369543]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
